Stephen Weil | The Museum at the End of Time
To: Members of the
Staff
Metropolitan Museum of Life From: Office of the
Director
As all of you must be aware by now, it has been
established beyond any possible doubt that the universe will cease, abruptly
and without a trace, a few seconds after 11:43 P.M. Greenwich mean time on
August 16, 2125. At its most recent meeting, the museum's board of trustees
asked me to be in touch with various of the museum's stakeholders (including
the staff) to solicit their views as to how this impending cessation of the
universe might impact the museum's operations during the interim and also to
inquire as to what changes in its programming, budget allocations, staffing,
and so forth they might think appropriate in the light of this unprecedented
situation. Responses may be sent directly to my attention. For the sake of
brevity, you may refer to the date of cessation as "C-Day".
Responses to the C-Day Memo from a history
curator: Humankind will never again be the same. As the clock ticks toward its
final tock, people, communities, and nations will behave toward one another in
entirely unpredictable ways. These new relationships will be reflected in works of
art, architecture, the deign of household objects, the content of publications
of every kind, and nore. I am proposing (a) that we immediately establish
apocalyptica as a major new collecting category that would cut across all
previous depart-nental boundaries and (b) that we undertake a series of
exhibitions to be given at regular intervals (perhaps once a decade through
2100, and at five-ear intervals after that) documenting the ways—sometimes
somber, sometimes amusing—in which various communities are coping with their
anticipated nullification. To provide just a touch of drama, the last of these
night be timed to close on C-Day.
FROM THE
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION:
Now that the
"Big Gnab" theory has finally been verified, I have two principal
concerns: the endowment and the impact of end-time inflation. Concerning the
endowment, it would clearly be absurd f any of this were left unspent on C-Day.
How and when we can get the court's permission to spend the restricted part is
something we'll need to consider. Given the freedom to do so, ought we treat it
as an annuity and plan to have it run out just as our own time expires?
Complicating this is he prospect of an inflation that will certainly rise to
ever-more-hyper dimensions as C-Day approaches and the future value of money
sinks toward nil. In those final days, what will induce our employees to come
to work when their wages are no longer meaningful? The availability of canned
food and bottled water might well be the answer. One of the things I hope we an
commission somewhere down the line is a computer simulation indicating how and
when we might optimally begin to shift parts of the endowment from securities
to edibles.
FROM A RECENTLY HIRED AND JUNIOR MEMBER OF THE
REGISTRAR´S DEPARTMENT:
One of my museum studies classmates argues that
registration work will start to slacken off as C-Day gets loser. He says that,
in the end, nobody will care. I think that's wrong. If I were here, I would
care. Even if the work weren't finished until the very afternoon of C-Day, I'd want to know that
there's not a single object in this collection that hasn't been properly
measured, photographed, and cata-3ged. It's a matter of duty. If something's
the right thing to do, it's the right thing to do no matter what the
circumstances. I hope that you and your successors will agree and maintain a
fully staffed registrar's department right up to the very last minute.
from the curator of film and video: Being a frustrated
artist myself, I can envision exactly what I'd like to have on view in our new
video gallery if I were still to be around when toodle-oo time comes along.
What I see is a huge, floor-to-ceiling globe with the world's twenty-four time
zones clearly marked. Inside each time zone, a television monitor would be
mounted. Displayed on each of these twenty-four monitors would be real-time
images televised in each case from the pertinent time zone. These would be
selected so that adjacent monitors showed contrasting images of tumultuous
urban life and placid natural beauty. As the countdown to C-Day nears its end,
and as the constraints of civilized behavior begin first to loosen and then
finally to fall away entirely, the juxtapositions and multiple ironies would
be remarkable. Imagine images of Shanghai in the throes of a Saturnalian
revelry, played off against images of the Pacific's steady roll as it heaves
itself westward. Think of a bacchanalian festival sweeping through the streets
of Buenos Aires, while the next monitor over shows images of the Andes in all
their cold, unearthly beauty; orgiastic London, and the night-shadowed fjords
of Norway; San Francisco, and the imperturbable Rockies. As humankind hurtles
back toward a state of nature, mute nature itself will be blindly marching down
the path to its own oblivion. All right there on the screen, all right here in
the museum. Oh, how I would like to live long enough to see it. I greatly envy
my remote successor, who most likely will.
from the head of security: People are motivated
to obey the law primarily by their fear of the consequences that may follow
from breaking it. As C-Day approaches, the consequences that follow anything
will become increasingly unlikely, and we can almost certainly expect to see a
gradual increase in crime. This will pose a threat to our collection, our visitors,
and our building. Although we would normally plan to counter this threat with a
corresponding increase in the size of our guard force, the approach of C-Day
may also prove to be a disincentive to work. If our collection, visitors, and
building are to be properly protected until the end, priority must be given to
the acquisition and development of a fully automated security system that
would not only apprehend potential perpetrators but might actually put them on
trial and, if it found them to be guilty, carry out their sentences as well.
If the museum is to make the maximum possible
use of its resources, what will be required is a strategic plan pursuant to
which those resources can be gradually redeployed from future-focused
activities to present-oriented ones, most particularly to public programming.
By crunch-time on C-Day, every last vestige of infrastructure should have been
phased out. Whatever remaining resources we've still got should (at least
ideally) by then have been dedicated to active public use. In terms of space,
this will mean converting our various working spaces (the conservation
laboratory, the library, the registrar's area, the carpentry and other shops,
and ultimately even our executive offices themselves) to gallery and/or
special-events spaces. Likewise, collections storage must eventually be
converted to open storage. The timing will be tricky. On the one hand, we don't
want to terminate vitally important activities prematurely. On the other, it
would be important to do this before terminal inflation makes the work
prohibitively costly.
from the head of development: Tempting as it may
be to concentrate on last things first—to wring our hands and complain that the
glass is already half empty—the fact is that C-Day is more than a century and a
quarter away. That's a half-full glass if I've ever seen one. Important now is
not to brood about how we'll end our days but to exult over what we can be doing
in the meanwhile to make them better. Development-wise, I think we can do
well—not just well, but very well. How do we turn this oblivion thing to good
use?
Well, for instance, since we won't be able to
celebrate any anniversaries after the event, why not celebrate them before? I
could see a benefit dinner dance to be held every August 16 with a regular
recurring theme like "The Last Supper? Not Quite Yet, but Still
Counting." If the curators weren't too finicky, a highlight of the evening
might be an auction of some things from the collection. The idea would be to
get an up-front payment for some future delivery (for example, on C-Day minus
ten). In the same vein, since our costume collection no longer has to be
preserved indefinitely, why couldn't we rent out some of the more famous items
for people to wear to these events? Ditto the jewelry collection? Samuel
Johnson once said that the knowledge that one was shortly to be hanged
"concentrates [the] mind wonderfully." Well, if that's so, then the
end of the universe should really get our creative juices flowing!!!
Think about your own museum. Assume the contrary
of what was imagined above. Assume that the "Big Gnab" theory has
been discredited, and that the universe is not going to cease without a trace
on August 16, 2125 or at any other time soon. To what extent has your museum
articulated a distinct obligation to future generations? To what extent is that
obligation explicitly reflected in its day-to-day operations? To what extent is
it implicit? Are you satisfied with the extent to which future obligations are
reflected in the operation of your museum? If not, what would you change?
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen